3 ms·
> At this risk of being accused of snark, tu quoque. How so? I feel I was being quite concise. > There’s no need to assume bad faith I did not assume anythin
by jstummbillig 7y ago
> At this risk of being accused of snark, tu quoque.
How so? I feel I was being quite concise.
> There’s no need to assume bad faith
I did not assume anything. There simply was nothing to work with.
- sjwright 7y ago> I feel I was being quite concise. And so does the OP, I'd wager. Personally I found the basis of the OP's criticism sufficiently self-evident to not require dissertation. If you didn't, that's fine too—but it's lazy criticism to declare that because YOU formed a different opinion that the OP was being lazy.