It's good to ask those questions, of course small companies are affected too. But, for example, if Dang selectively removed posts such that the remaining posts

It's good to ask those questions, of course small companies are affected too. But, for example, if Dang selectively removed posts such that the remaining posts slandered someone in a way that none of the individual posters intended, I believe Dang would be the only one in the chain liable for the resulting slander, not the posters. But under current law, Dang has protection under 230, so no one could get charged for the resulting slander That's an extreme hypothetical case of course.