3 ms·

This is incredibly lazy criticism. You add no analysis, reasoning or anything of value.

• deelly 7y ago
  Recursive sarcasm?
• sjwright 7y ago
  At this risk of being accused of snark, tu quoque. If you don’t understand the basis of the OP’s opinion, you’re welcome to ask. There’s no need to assume bad faith.
  • jstummbillig 7y ago
    > At this risk of being accused of snark, tu quoque. How so? I feel I was being quite concise. > There’s no need to assume bad faith I did not assume anything. There simply was nothing to work with.
    • sjwright 7y ago
      > I feel I was being quite concise. And so does the OP, I'd wager. Personally I found the basis of the OP's criticism sufficiently self-evident to not require dissertation. If you didn't, that's fine too—but it's lazy criticism to declare that because YOU formed a different opinion that the OP was being lazy.