3 ms·
The dataset you linked is from 1971. The older cohorts were born near the turn of the century when nutrition wasn't exactly the greatest for large segments of
by mdorazio 7y ago
The dataset you linked is from 1971. The older cohorts were born near the turn of the century when nutrition wasn't exactly the greatest for large segments of the population. It's most likely that the skew is due to environmental factors rather than ethnic ones there. See [1]. Age related height declines don't even start until age 40 and are quite small for some time, so it's unlikely to be a factor in dating-related data sets. See [2].
[1] https://academic.oup.com/jn/article/136/2/473/4664347 https://academic.oup.com/jn/article/136/2/473/4664347
[2] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2807265 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2807265
- robocat 7y agoI found a link with 2016 data: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr122-508.pdf https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr122-508.pdf Over 60's are about 1" shorter. Hispanics are a lot shorter. I am pointing out that the sampling biases are important when looking for cause and effect when comparing against a population average.