3 ms·
I'm not so enlightened as Anton. I think that closures are closures and objects are just syntax sugar over closures
by Ingaz 16y ago
I'm not so enlightened as Anton.
I think that closures are closures and objects are just syntax sugar over closures
- Animus7 16y agoA lot of people would disagree, and hence the koan. Personally, I see closures as objects that the compiler cooks up on your behalf. This coming from a compiler background, where said compiler is usually implemented in C++ :P.
- Confusion 16y agoYou will want to read this[1] and the links in there. (And note the names of those involved in the thread; those were the days...) [1] http://people.csail.mit.edu/gregs/ll1-discuss-archive-html/msg03277.html http://people.csail.mit.edu/gregs/ll1-discuss-archive-html/m...