2 ms·
But that means you are the only source of truth for your anecdote, so it doesn't demonstrate anything. Are you possibly trying to avoid invoking godwin's law?
by Chris2048 7y ago
But that means you are the only source of truth for your anecdote, so it doesn't demonstrate anything.
Are you possibly trying to avoid invoking godwin's law?
- ben_w 7y agoIf I were, would it be good or bad? Would it even matter at all? Remember the specific thrust of argument in this subthread isn’t to demonise Leave voters it’s just to demonstrate that it’s possible for democracy to give bad answers. Mentioning He Who Cannot Be Named isn’t going to help separate concerns here, rather the opposite.
- Chris2048 7y agobad answers aren't wrong answers. You are arguing on the basis of facts, yet throttling who is able to access to those facts.
- ben_w 7y ago> bad answers aren't wrong answers If that implies true answers can be bad, I agree: they can upset whoever one is trying to communicate with to the point they shut you out entirely. History is my source of facts, not me personally. If I am not being unambiguous already, then there is more than one example of the situation I have described.