5 ms·
Since Facebook and Google shape the information that is seen using a proprietary algorithm, they have become publishers. Perhaps if their algorithm's were open
by psychlops 7y ago
Since Facebook and Google shape the information that is seen using a proprietary algorithm, they have become publishers. Perhaps if their algorithm's were open and available, they may have an argument in their defense.
Until then, it is entirely possible they are shaping a narrative based on whatever model they want.
I don't buy the argument made by Barr that the scale of the platform reaches a point that it therefore requires regulation. This seems to be a simple money grab where large tech companies need to tithe to lawmakers.
- micmil 7y agoIf it's coming from Barr it's not a money grab, it's a transparent attempt to shape ALL social networks to be right-wing propaganda outlets.
- decasteve 7y agoYou hit the nail on the head. They want to shape the content and do whatever curation or editorializing via human or algorithmic means, yet be seen an an open forum of user-generated content. Have it and eat it too scenario. Not to mention adding paid content that blends in in a way that is indistinguishable from user submissions. This further complicates the intentions of the platform.
- d1zzy 7y agoYes, they most definitely want the cake and eat it too but there are lots of good arguments to make for that, arguments that have nothing to do with sustaining the business model of multi-billion dollar Internet companies.