3 ms·
I am confused by the use of "WYSIWYG". It seems to be more a control console/REPL with Natural Language syntax. Edit: A killer feature would be autocomplete f
by dariusj18 7y ago
I am confused by the use of "WYSIWYG". It seems to be more a control console/REPL with Natural Language syntax.
Edit: A killer feature would be autocomplete for things found on the page.
- hliyan 7y agoYou're right -- we just put it in double quotes to convey the meaning. It's not entirely accurate. The idea is that you write the script based on what you see, and now what in the HTML. I guess we could do better with the description.
- hypewatch 7y agoI was also confused by the term “English like”. I think that better terms would be “simple” and “readable”.
- hliyan 7y agoWill take this into consideration when going out of beta...
- hliyan 7y ago> Edit: A killer feature would be autocomplete for things found on the page. Challenge accepted!
- TuringTest 7y agoIMHO it would also benefit from a "raw typing" mode. It's a bit silly to have to explicitly write 'type "cat"' and 'press "enter"', when you're already typing 'cat' and 'enter'. You could simply start this raw mode with a keyboard shortcut, and everything you type is automatically transformed into this "type" and "press" commands, until you exit the mode with either the same shortcut or Esc.
- dariusj18 7y agoOr if the first thing you type is a quote if you are focused on an input, then it infers the type command, otherwise it's a focus search.