6 ms·
Much of the information floating around regarding 2019-ncov has hallmarks of "conspiracy theory" because it is all happening in real time and legitimate media i
by allovernow 7y ago
Much of the information floating around regarding 2019-ncov has hallmarks of "conspiracy theory" because it is all happening in real time and legitimate media is unwilling to publish anything without confirmation from "official" sources...who in turn are not willing to confirm anything because anecdotal reports and pending peer review journal articles do not meet (understandable) verifiability standards. This unfortunately relegates any news to unnofficial "conspiracy" channels and gives people a dangerous justification for dismissing potentially legitimate reports.
If you've been paying attention for the last month or two, there are hundreds of anecdotal reports and videos all pointing toward the same grave conclusions - not to mention dozens of published (awaiting review) papers at this point and, increasingly, many if not most of the rumors from 1-2 months ago are gradually being confirmed. Look no further than China's unprecedented response to this outbreak - 700 million people are under lockdown and their GDP is effectively shut down.
Frankly, the modern media establishment's standards for proof are too high to adequately cover such a rapidly unfolding catastrophy when the majority of information has to come from unofficial leaks because ground zero is an authoritarian regime which controls what it's citizens can say amongst themselves and to the rest of the world. This epidemic is far worse than westerners currently seem to understand, and if it is not contained, the chaos that will grip the rest of the world will be truly awesome to behold. This is a virus which is at least as deadly as the infamous 1918 flu, likely more virulent (R0 estimates anywhere from 3 to 6+), and there is still no cure, though a paper was published on the 4th with chloroquine as a potential candidate. Plus, based on autoimmune reactions induced by all previously developed viable vaccine candidates for SARS and MERS, there is unlikely to be a vaccine for this coronavirus as well.
As I've been saying for a month now, we should not be panicking, but there's no excuse at this point not to be prepared. WSJ announced 5400 people in California are under quarantine today. 700 people in WA under supervision from authorities. Personally I'm moving to minimize my reliance on the government in the case that this pandemic spreads to the U.S. at large, based on the rank incompetence that we see in government activities on a frequent basis.
Honestly watching so many average people dismiss 2019-ncov has been a fascinating exposé on the potential for centralized information control in free speech societies - if you're a 3 letter agency and you want something to disappear from public consciousness, just preemptively leak the story to "questionable" sources and suddenly the media won't report on it and people will balk at you for posting junk sources. What a world we live in!
- merlincorey 7y ago> WSJ announced 5400 people in California are under quarantine today. 700 people in WA under supervision from authorities. I was curious about the source for this so I searched and found this: https://www.wsj.com/articles/coronavirus-has-u-s-cities-stretching-to-monitor-self-quarantined-americans-11582108203 https://www.wsj.com/articles/coronavirus-has-u-s-cities-stre... It states the 5400 Californians are under "self quarantine", as opposed to the Washington State enforced quarantine of 700.
- Johnny555 7y agoThis post sounds like a conspiracy theory. The reason traditional media and other authoritative sources are so reluctant to post speculation is to avoid spreading unwarranted panic. Right now, Influenza is a far bigger risk to the average person, and less than half of Americans bother to get vaccinated.
- chrisco255 7y agoWell the vaccine is only about 50% effective so it's sort of a tossup if it's worth getting.
- Johnny555 7y agoIf the vaccine gives me 50% protection from a disease that will leave me bedridden for a week and that disease has a 0.1% chance of killing me, I'll take that vaccine (and I have -- ever year now for the past 20 or so years, ever since I last got the flu). I can't say whether or not it's working, but I haven't caught the flu since I started getting vaccinated.
- wolfram74 7y ago.1% is pretty pessimistic on vaccine mortality. There are circumstances where it would be preferable to the alternative, but I don't think there are any /that/ bad.
- 7y ago