3 ms·
> 30% penetration in the USA. Here we are talking about global usage. Then later in this same thread you say: > Webpages in non-latin alphabets probably use w
by CoolGuySteve 7y ago
> 30% penetration in the USA. Here we are talking about global usage.
Then later in this same thread you say:
> Webpages in non-latin alphabets probably use way less fonts from Google Fonts.
So uh, which is it?
- jfkebwjsbx 7y agoI don't follow. Precisely because we are talking about the global usage you have to consider webpages in non-latin alphabets which increase the ratio of Macs for latin alphabet countries.