4 ms·

The Wikipedia article for Cut, Copy, and Paste[1] seems to have this bit that's cited to that book: > Inspired by early line and character editors that broke a

by jolmg 7y ago

The Wikipedia article for Cut, Copy, and Paste[1] seems to have this bit that's cited to that book: > Inspired by early line and character editors that broke a move or copy operation into two steps—between which the user could invoke a preparatory action such as navigation—Lawrence G. Tesler (Larry Tesler) proposed the names "cut" and "copy" for the first step and "paste" for the second step. Beginning in 1974, he and colleagues at Xerox Corporation Palo Alto Research Center (PARC) implemented several text editors that used cut/copy-and-paste commands to move/copy text. I imagine those "early line and character editors" refers to vi's delete, yank, and put, and emacs's kill, copy/"save as if killed", and yank. I wonder what other editors had back then, before the names he came up with became standardized. I also wonder how the idea of the operations developed before Larry Tesler contributed to it. Looking at POSIX[2], it seems ex has delete, yank, and put, but I can't see similar functionality in standard ed (GNU's ed does have yank, but I guess it's an extension). [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cut,_copy,_and_paste#Popularization https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cut,_copy,_and_paste#Populariz... [2] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/ https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/

jcynix 7y ago
There's more than emacs or vi in "editor history" e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bravo_%28software%29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bravo_%28software%29 and follow-ups at Xerox PARC.
fsckboy 7y ago
TECO from the 1960's had more than cut and paste, multiple storage slots called "q registers" (they were named with letters) into which you could put text from the main buffer, and from which you could retrieve it back. Text regions in the buffer were referred to by numeric ranges, some number of characters forward or back relative to the current cursor position, with additional notions such as "here to beginning/end of line" or "n lines back/forward from cursor" TECO commands were typed in as code, essentially, and that code could also be saved and run as macros. it was extremely powerful, such that emacs was originally written as TECO Edit MACros.
- wnoise 7y ago
  Ah! That's why vi's letter-named registers are written to with the q command.
  - jolmg 7y ago
    I wonder if they're supposed to be "q(uick) registers". EDIT: Maybe not: https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/12081/why-were-teco-variables-called-q-registers https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/12081/why...
  - bch 7y ago
    I was confused by the ‘q’ command in vi, so I did quick testing (in nvi(1)) and scanned vim cheat sheets. I still don’t know what ‘q’ does in the named buffer context - help?
    - okal 7y ago
      Recording macros, I think.
      - bch 7y ago
        Looks like you’re correct![0] In nvi, I just key my commands on a scratch line (testing occasionally), then: “xyy to load the whole line (yy) into buffer ‘x’ (“x). Execution (@x) thereafter looks ~same. [0] https://vim.fandom.com/wiki/Macros https://vim.fandom.com/wiki/Macros
deleted 7y ago
[deleted]
tyfon 7y ago
Douglas Engelbart demonstrated copy/paste with a mouse in 1968 [1], however I'm not sure what he called the process. It was also very much an experimental system and not something for sale. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJDv-zdhzMY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJDv-zdhzMY
kragen 7y ago
> I imagine those "early line and character editors" refers to vi's delete, yank, and put, and emacs's kill, copy/"save as if killed", and yank. No, 1974 predates both vi and Emacs
- jolmg 7y ago
  You're right, I missed that. Vi's predecessor ex, which also had these operations, is from '76, so it also couldn't be it. However, Emacs's TECO, which also had yank, is from '62/'63, so that might've been one.
  - jjtheblunt 7y ago
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_(text_editor) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_(text_editor)
    - jolmg 7y ago
      Ed doesn't seem to have those operations. GNU ed's documentation includes yank, but it's not described in POSIX.
raphman 7y ago
FWIW, Larry also contributed some of his historical knowledge to the Talk page [1] of the Wikipedia article and also edited the article himself. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cut,_copy,_and_paste https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cut,_copy,_and_paste
- jolmg 7y ago
  Nice catch! And it was on a discussion on the question of "Does anyone know where this idea came from?" Here's a nice bit: > I chose Z/X/C/V when I was in charge of the user interface design of Apple's Lisa. In addition to their adjacency on the keyboard, I wanted them to have mnemonic value: "X" a cross-out; "V" an inverted caret or proofreader's arrowhead; "C" the first letter of "copy"; the strokes of "Z" tracing a reversal followed by a new path forward. -- Larry Tesler > Correction: Apparently, my memory was incorrect. The Lisa user interface seems to have used "U" for Undo. On the Mac (as in Gypsy), "U" was and is for Underline. I do not know who chose "Z" for Mac Undo, or why. I suspect that its proximity to the Command key was the reason. -- Larry Tesler There's more, but it's too much to insert here. I'm just hoping this isn't someone posing as Larry Tesler.

by jolmg 7y ago

jcynix 7y ago

There's more than emacs or vi in "editor history" e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bravo_%28software%29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bravo_%28software%29 and follow-ups at Xerox PARC.

fsckboy 7y ago

TECO from the 1960's had more than cut and paste, multiple storage slots called "q registers" (they were named with letters) into which you could put text from the main buffer, and from which you could retrieve it back. Text regions in the buffer were referred to by numeric ranges, some number of characters forward or back relative to the current cursor position, with additional notions such as "here to beginning/end of line" or "n lines back/forward from cursor" TECO commands were typed in as code, essentially, and that code could also be saved and run as macros. it was extremely powerful, such that emacs was originally written as TECO Edit MACros.

wnoise 7y ago
Ah! That's why vi's letter-named registers are written to with the q command.
- jolmg 7y ago
  I wonder if they're supposed to be "q(uick) registers". EDIT: Maybe not: https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/12081/why-were-teco-variables-called-q-registers https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/12081/why...
- bch 7y ago
  I was confused by the ‘q’ command in vi, so I did quick testing (in nvi(1)) and scanned vim cheat sheets. I still don’t know what ‘q’ does in the named buffer context - help?
  - okal 7y ago
    Recording macros, I think.
    - bch 7y ago
      Looks like you’re correct![0] In nvi, I just key my commands on a scratch line (testing occasionally), then: “xyy to load the whole line (yy) into buffer ‘x’ (“x). Execution (@x) thereafter looks ~same. [0] https://vim.fandom.com/wiki/Macros https://vim.fandom.com/wiki/Macros

deleted 7y ago

[deleted]

tyfon 7y ago

Douglas Engelbart demonstrated copy/paste with a mouse in 1968 [1], however I'm not sure what he called the process. It was also very much an experimental system and not something for sale. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJDv-zdhzMY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJDv-zdhzMY

kragen 7y ago

> I imagine those "early line and character editors" refers to vi's delete, yank, and put, and emacs's kill, copy/"save as if killed", and yank. No, 1974 predates both vi and Emacs

jolmg 7y ago
You're right, I missed that. Vi's predecessor ex, which also had these operations, is from '76, so it also couldn't be it. However, Emacs's TECO, which also had yank, is from '62/'63, so that might've been one.
- jjtheblunt 7y ago
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_(text_editor) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_(text_editor)
  - jolmg 7y ago
    Ed doesn't seem to have those operations. GNU ed's documentation includes yank, but it's not described in POSIX.

raphman 7y ago

FWIW, Larry also contributed some of his historical knowledge to the Talk page [1] of the Wikipedia article and also edited the article himself. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cut,_copy,_and_paste https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cut,_copy,_and_paste

jolmg 7y ago
Nice catch! And it was on a discussion on the question of "Does anyone know where this idea came from?" Here's a nice bit: > I chose Z/X/C/V when I was in charge of the user interface design of Apple's Lisa. In addition to their adjacency on the keyboard, I wanted them to have mnemonic value: "X" a cross-out; "V" an inverted caret or proofreader's arrowhead; "C" the first letter of "copy"; the strokes of "Z" tracing a reversal followed by a new path forward. -- Larry Tesler > Correction: Apparently, my memory was incorrect. The Lisa user interface seems to have used "U" for Undo. On the Mac (as in Gypsy), "U" was and is for Underline. I do not know who chose "Z" for Mac Undo, or why. I suspect that its proximity to the Command key was the reason. -- Larry Tesler There's more, but it's too much to insert here. I'm just hoping this isn't someone posing as Larry Tesler.