4 ms·
You're describing cut-through switching [1]. Because of its disadvantage, it is usually limited to uses that require pure performance, such as HFT (High Frequen
by mertenVan 7y ago
You're describing cut-through switching [1]. Because of its disadvantage, it is usually limited to uses that require pure performance, such as HFT (High Frequency Trading). Traditional store-and-forward switching is still commonly used (or some hybrid approach).
"The advantage of this technique is speed; the disadvantage is that even frames with integrity problems are forwarded. Because of this disadvantage, cut-through switches were limited to specific positions within the network that required pure performance, and typically they were not tasked with performing extended functionality (core)." [2]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cut-through_switching https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cut-through_switching
[2] http://www.pearsonitcertification.com/articles/article.aspx?p=2420611 http://www.pearsonitcertification.com/articles/article.aspx?...
- rmwaite 7y agoCut through switching and single pass processing is extremely common in data center architectures. This is not only for specific use cases - it is necessary to provide the capabilities beyond forwarding while still allowing maximum throughput.
- Hikikomori 7y agoMost 10GE+ datacenter switches use cut through switching, not uncommon at all, not just something HFT uses. Bitflips are very rare in a datacenter environment, typically caused a bad cable that you can just replace or clean. And crc check is done at the receiving system or router anyway.