2 ms·
Of course, because security issues and language pitfalls have no bearing on cryptographic implementations.
by onlydeadheroes 7y ago
Of course, because security issues and language pitfalls have no bearing on cryptographic implementations.
- detaro 7y ago"Dynamic languages have issues" does not say "all other languages are good".
- wayneftw 7y agoIn this context, where the commenter is replying to an article about a dynamic language and their comment recommends non-dynamic languages? Yeah it kinda does say something like that. Anyway, could you please not speak to people here as if you’re a moderator and leave moderation to the staff? Thanks a bunch!
- onlydeadheroes 7y agoHe is saying dynamic languages crash and burn in this context. Specifying "dynamic" does strongly suggest non-dynamic languages do not crash and burn in this context.