I don't know why this is downvoted (maybe I'm missing a bad joke)? But this is exactly why people are excited about this. Either, a) we have a systematic in ou

I don't know why this is downvoted (maybe I'm missing a bad joke)? But this is exactly why people are excited about this. Either, a) we have a systematic in our measurement and our model is right and eventually we'll work this out when we fix up everything, or b) our model isn't right and there is new physics (i.e. something not in Lambda CDM + GR) that explains this discrepancy.