2 ms·
As I said above I have no interest in diving into these trivial and frankly baseless arguments. Talking about inter-union competition when there are no unions i
by Someone1234 7y ago
As I said above I have no interest in diving into these trivial and frankly baseless arguments. Talking about inter-union competition when there are no unions is a huge waste of time and energy. Let's actually have unions first before we worry too much about unions being too powerful.
Using it as an argument against creating a single union seems like a distraction.
- chimeracoder 7y ago> Talking about inter-union competition when there are no unions is a huge waste of time and energy. The same factors which led to the rise of exclusive representation are the ones which led to the drop in union representation across the board. If you want to ignore that, fine, but don't be surprised or disappointed when you don't end up with the result you seem to want (more union representation).
- username90 7y agoUnions in Europe are usually optional and are thriving. Unions in USA are usually forced and are not thriving. Don't you think that USA should learn a bit from Europe about this since they are typically far ahead of USA on worker rights issues?