6 ms·
It might sound crazy but the govt DID this for cigarettes. Have you read the warning on cigarettes? I mean just look at the suggested box design here: https://
by coding123 7y ago
It might sound crazy but the govt DID this for cigarettes. Have you read the warning on cigarettes?
I mean just look at the suggested box design here:
https://www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/labeling-and-warning-statements-tobacco-products/fda-proposes-new-health-warnings-cigarette-packs-and-ads https://www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/labeling-and-warning-st...
I mean really look at that, and fully take in the notion that our government required that. That, that takes balls.
- joering2 7y agoIf you think that takes balls, then you have no idea how big are European Union balls. Just google “cigarette packages in europe” and get ready to get seriously shocked.
- capableweb 7y agoAs a European, I think Australia went even further and just removed all the branding from packages completely. In Europe, brands still get to have some design.
- plop_ 7y agoSeems like some EU countries are now requiring a plain packaging too. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_tobacco_packaging#By_country https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_tobacco_packaging#By_cou...
- gambiting 7y ago"Europe" is not a single place with one set of regulations - in the UK for instance there is no branding on packages at all. It's called "standardised plain packaging": https://ash.org.uk/category/information-and-resources/packaging-labelling-information-and-resources/standardised-plain-packaging/ https://ash.org.uk/category/information-and-resources/packag...
- ggcdn 7y agoCanadian packages too. They required a rather graphic health warning over 50% of the surface area (showing a smokers lungs with explanation, etc) and also removed branding. So it’s a giant health warning over the top half, and then a plain brown lower half with the name/type
- justaguyhere 7y agoCurious - do these packages work? Have they reduced smoking addiction?
- mantap 7y agoMaybe. What helps more is 1) indoor smoking bans, stopping people from smoking socially inside bars and restaurants, 2) heavy taxation, 3) vaping.
- dwild 7y agoI don't know if it apply to the whole country or only my province (Quebec) but since then we also added that they can't be marketed at all. That include not being visible in a convenience store. I don't know how effective the pictures were, but not being visible that must have affected the statistics too.
- ggcdn 7y ago(I don't smoke btw, but my father-in-law smokes like a chimney) Its hard to relate cause and effects, but I see a noticeable decline in smoking among younger people, and smoking has become very uncool. People will also make a big deal about second hand smoke, for instance if you're near a bus stop or busy sidewalk you may get called out. I don't know if anything besides medical intervention can stop a seasoned veteran smoker, though. Packaging certainly hasn't had any effect on my few family members that smoke.
- ApolloFortyNine 7y agoIn the U.S smoking has dramatically decreased, and we don't have totally insane packaging like Canada/some of the EU. [1] [1] https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/08/cdc-says-smoking-rates-fall-to-record-low-in-us.html https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/08/cdc-says-smoking-rates-fall-... Smoking has just generally fallen by the way side worldwide.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- Kiro 7y agoWhat are you talking about? That (and way more explicit) has been standard in most western countries for decades. The US is just slow to adapt modern practices. No balls involved there.