4 ms·

The article also explains that this is intentionally falsified by the Swedish police and lists emails as evidence that this tampering took place and contradicts

by zwirbl 7y ago

The article also explains that this is intentionally falsified by the Swedish police and lists emails as evidence that this tampering took place and contradicts the womans initial statement

bjourne 7y ago
The email conversation is not evidence of tampering. The emails is from one interrogator emailing another on how to best record the witness statements in their system. See this thread for English translations: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22209868 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22209868
- boomboomsubban 7y ago
  The witness statement is supposed to be verified by the witness at the end of the interrogation. Editing that statement without consulting the witness is tampering, no system would save statements like that.
  - bjourne 7y ago
    But the statement wasn't edited... It was copy-pasted into another record, just like the mail conversation shows. Also, in this supposed grand conspiracy to frame Assange, two crime detectives were dumb enough to leave their marks in emails available to the public, due to Offentlighetsprincipen? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_public_access_to_official_records https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_public_access_to_... It makes zero sense.
    - boomboomsubban 7y ago
      The original statement was overwritten, we only have some vague references about what it says. But moving it to another record without the witness present is still tampering. >Also, in this supposed grand conspiracy to frame Assange, two crime detectives were dumb enough to leave their marks in emails available to the public The conspiracy was to get Assange into US custody, not frame him of a crime, and that conspiracy has been proven to he true. The allegations didn't need to be flawlessly done.
  - brianTheDog 7y ago
    The FBI does that.

4 ms·

The article also explains that this is intentionally falsified by the Swedish police and lists emails as evidence that this tampering took place and contradicts

by zwirbl 7y ago

The article also explains that this is intentionally falsified by the Swedish police and lists emails as evidence that this tampering took place and contradicts the womans initial statement

bjourne 7y ago
The email conversation is not evidence of tampering. The emails is from one interrogator emailing another on how to best record the witness statements in their system. See this thread for English translations: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22209868 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22209868
- boomboomsubban 7y ago
  The witness statement is supposed to be verified by the witness at the end of the interrogation. Editing that statement without consulting the witness is tampering, no system would save statements like that.
  - bjourne 7y ago
    But the statement wasn't edited... It was copy-pasted into another record, just like the mail conversation shows. Also, in this supposed grand conspiracy to frame Assange, two crime detectives were dumb enough to leave their marks in emails available to the public, due to Offentlighetsprincipen? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_public_access_to_official_records https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_public_access_to_... It makes zero sense.
    - boomboomsubban 7y ago
      The original statement was overwritten, we only have some vague references about what it says. But moving it to another record without the witness present is still tampering. >Also, in this supposed grand conspiracy to frame Assange, two crime detectives were dumb enough to leave their marks in emails available to the public The conspiracy was to get Assange into US custody, not frame him of a crime, and that conspiracy has been proven to he true. The allegations didn't need to be flawlessly done.
  - brianTheDog 7y ago
    The FBI does that.