3 ms·
The same reason you might be concerned even if a doctor can deliver a baby safely despite not washing his hands in between a cadaver examination and touching yo
by afarrell 7y ago
The same reason you might be concerned even if a doctor can deliver a baby safely despite not washing his hands in between a cadaver examination and touching your wife.
Do you feel lucky? Well, do ya?
- matz1 7y agoSure, If the doctor can deliver baby safely and not causing any other damage despite not washing hands then what's the issue? That's why I asked what is the actual damage. Is the money is stolen ? Is the money can't be accessed ? If the bank doesn't do me any actual damage despite the clear text password then I don't see why I should be concerned. I guess I can see that for some people, clear text password usage can cause them anxiety and lose some sleep.
- afarrell 7y agoAre you genuinely saying that when you see someone putting you at risk, that you do not see a problem with it until a problem actually occurs? Imagine you worked in a building for a week and didn’t die in a fire. Would you have a problem with discovering that the writing was done by a amateur, there were piles of lint and fabric everywhere, and there was only one revolving-door exit? If yes, then you understand the problem of risk and its just a question of magnitude. If not, then you should be aware that you see the world dramatically differently than most people.
- matz1 7y agoThe risk are highly exaggerated, the damage may never occurs in the first place. It may seem unlikely that the bank can keep my money save by using plain text pwd but if they can somehow do that, why do I care. Even in the unlikely event that the money is stolen but if the bank can handle that without causing me disruption then whats the issue.