I think it is totally fair game to speculate about whether this was an accidental release from a government lab. Such a release has already happened before. See

I think it is totally fair game to speculate about whether this was an accidental release from a government lab. Such a release has already happened before. See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sverdlovsk_anthrax_leak https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sverdlovsk_anthrax_leak. And of course everyone said it was not possible and that such claims were unsubstantiated, until the truth came out years later. Also, read the article blamed for spreading misinformation, from Zero Hedge: https://www.zerohedge.com/health/man-behind-global-coronavirus-pandemic https://www.zerohedge.com/health/man-behind-global-coronavir... As in, actually read it directly. Not an article or opinion about it, but the actual article linked above: This lab publicly (on the Internet) advertised jobs concerning bats and coronavirus research. The scientist they named was the listed head of the lab that the job is for. His contact information is publicly available. And yet everyone demonized Zero Hedge for doxxing. Often times, such research requires handling infected organisms, manipulations/modifications of the virus, and so on. Why would the release of a virus from a lab (accidental or otherwise, engineered or not) be out of the question? Why is it irresponsible to point at the possibility?