From what I've seen almost everyone who "specializes" in UFO's ends up going off the deep end in one way or another. Some people who tend to try to stick to wh

From what I've seen almost everyone who "specializes" in UFO's ends up going off the deep end in one way or another. Some people who tend to try to stick to what's verifiable are: John Greenwald - Specializes in FOIA, sometimes over-focuses on probably irrelevant details but is evolving. Mick West - A skeptic, one of the few people who has attempted any serious public analysis of the Navy videos, seems reasonably open minded though biased toward the most ordinary possible explanations even of phenomena that clearly deviate substantially from the ordinary. Luis Elizondo - Certainly worth listening to, though opinions vary greatly on his credibility. Tim McMillan - The author of the original post. Looks promising, especially if most of his claims here turn out to be accurate.