2 ms·
Sure, they have "highly advanced prototypes" where those prototypes obey the known laws of physics and experience inertia. They have drones that are better tha
by pfisch 7y ago
Sure, they have "highly advanced prototypes" where those prototypes obey the known laws of physics and experience inertia.
They have drones that are better than the existing drones. They absolutely don't have drones that are anything like the impossible vehicles in these UFO reports though.
- nine_k 7y agoIf some radio and optical trickery may lead an observer to believe that the device moves in impossible ways, it's valuable. Remember that we have strategic bombers with a radio signature of a trash can, or whatever. This is seen as normal, and has been publicized for decades. Same with Russian supersonic fighter jets that can stop in the air for a moment. If we (or "they") have a drone with a visual signature of an inertia-less device (under certain angles, doing a special manoeuvre, etc), this does not mean they are actually inerta-less, but that they can fool the aiming systems.
- ColanR 7y ago> If some radio and optical trickery may lead an observer to believe that the device moves in impossible ways, it's valuable. Pretty sure this was ruled out by the multiple methods of observation used.
- tgflynn 7y agoI don't think so. It's at least conceivable that an induced plasma phenomenon could be visible to radar, IR and the human eye.