3 ms·
I run the setup of S3 + Cloudfront and never ran into their index problem because I'm not trying for URLs without document file extensions. I assume that's the
by lawik 7y ago
I run the setup of S3 + Cloudfront and never ran into their index problem because I'm not trying for URLs without document file extensions.
I assume that's the reason for really wanting index redirect in directories. Pretty URLs, I didn't feel the need. There are other valid reasons too I'm sure. But my needs diverged from the article even earlier than SEO penalties.
- mlmitch 7y agoThe pretty URLs thing is confusing me now too. AWS lets you configure the buckets to do the pretty URLs. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/HowDoIWebsiteConfiguration.html https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/HowDoIWebsit... https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/IndexDocumentSupport.html https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/IndexDocumen... I put up a Jekyll site on s3/cloudfront recently and it seems to work well. Anyway, I’m still wondering about the consequences of the naked s3 endpoint being available.