4 ms·
> In general, the first models of calculators had their own operational language, and the user had to learn the specific procedures related to each calculator.
by FillardMillmore 7y ago
> In general, the first models of calculators had their own operational language, and the user had to learn the specific procedures related to each calculator. Let's take, for example, the C3-07, the first calculator of the Series "C" manufactured by the Leningrad factory "Svetlana."
Forgive the focus on tangential information, but I'm curious, was this factory named after Stalin's daughter, Svetlana Alliluyeva? If so, it would seem a little strange that the factory would remain in the '70s with this name long after Khrushchev's secret speech and the subsequent de-Stalinization that took place to deconstruct the influence of Stalin's cult of personality. I can't seem to find any real info on the factory with a google search, but does strike me as curious.
- erikbye 7y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svetlana_(company) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svetlana_(company)
- FillardMillmore 7y agoD'oh! I must have used too many search terms in my query. Thanks for providing the link. Appears the company was founded in the late 1800s, so certainly not named after Stalin's daughter.
- rdtsc 7y agoA sibling post noticed it seems to be an abbreviation related to electrical lights, but it is worth mentioning that Svetlana is just a common name. Like say, Jenny or Stacy. A few my teachers had that name, for example. The shortened version, "Sveta" is also common. It would be different, for example, if it was an extremely rare name shared with Stalin's daughter.
- FillardMillmore 7y agoYes, it would appear it is a common name in Russia. Though, in the late '70s (and perhaps even now), I believe Stalin's daughter was still the most famous person bearing the name. And me being ignorant of both this particular factory and its origins couldn't help but wonder (knowing the Soviet propensity for naming things in honor of the leaders - e.g. Stalingrad, Leningrad, etc.) if there happened to be any relation.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- pandaman 7y agoI can see how you could get confused. "Svetlana" is a strange name since it hasn't been used to name real people until early 20th century. The most famous Svetlana had always been the character from the eponimous poem. The name had been used to name things, places and literally characters but not real people since it has not been recognized by the Church. So, in a sense, it is the Stalin's daughter who is named after the factory.
- anticodon 7y agoIn Soviet Union places were named in honor of the people that did something good for the country. Stalin's daughter didn't do anything significant in her life - why would anyone name anything in honor of her????? People in the West has so perverse understanding of Russian/Soviet realities due to exorbitant amount of anti-Russian and especially anti-Soviet propaganda. I wonder if there was even a single positive thing ever published on the West about USSR. And people laugh at me when I say I don't believe any news (they believe they're becoming enlightened by reading or watching fake news which is any news source).
- FillardMillmore 7y agoI see the ignorance of my question now - essentially the question was borne out of a lack of knowledge about how common the name 'Svetlana' is. The only 'Svetlana' I knew about was Stalin's daughter. My brain made a connection where one didn't exist. You are most certainly correct about the lack of understanding in the West about Russian/Soviet realities. Do you have any books you'd recommend to aid in an understanding of this? I recently picked up 'Everyday Stalinism' by Sheila Fitzpatrick - focusing on the lives of the average person during Stalin's time in power but it certainly casts a more negative light on this time than positive. With that said, I'd be more than interested in reading accounts that cast a more positive light on things. I've also read 'Khrushchev Lied' by Grover Furr - this book focuses more on half-truths and omissions of truth made in Khrushchev's secret speech about Stalin. Reading about Grover's history, it would seem he is not entirely unbiased but there were details in there that gave pause for thought. As for whether there was anything positive published in the West about the USSR, have you heard about Walter Duranty's writing for the New York Times and the subsequent Pulitzer Prize? That is, of course, a somewhat facetious example. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Duranty https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Duranty There were certainly positive things written about the USSR during the war (as they became allies with Western forces), with Stalin being affectionately called 'Uncle Joe' - things of course got less positive during the Cold War and the Red Scare. Are there no news sources you trust? Aren't there news reports that cite primary evidence that you would deem as trustworthy? And if you don't get your current info from news sources, where do you get it from?