4 ms·
Ah, question, would a veto by people you named reliable on any large scale move, after your decision has been proofen impaired once, be a acceptable solution fo
by onceUponADime 7y ago
Ah, question, would a veto by people you named reliable on any large scale move, after your decision has been proofen impaired once, be a acceptable solution for society?
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- alehul 7y agoFrom an American perspective, my first thought would be "how could this power, vested in the state, be abused by an authoritarian government?"
- onceUponADime 7y agoWhy vested into the state? Its three of your fellow citizens? You choose?
- alehul 7y ago> after your decision has been proofen impaired once Who decides that your decision has been proven impaired, and how?
- saddestcatever 7y ago...like a personal board of directors.
- heartbeats 7y agoI'm not posting this to be a pedant, but I had a bit of trouble understanding it. >Ah, so a question: if your decision-making abilities have been shown to be impaired once, would giving veto powers on any large-scale decision to people you have previously appointed, be an acceptable solution for society?