>I still don't understand what your point is. You wrote "Getty...claim[ed] to be the sole copyright holder." They did not. My first reply quoted this to show

>I still don't understand what your point is. You wrote "Getty...claim[ed] to be the sole copyright holder." They did not. My first reply quoted this to show the difference between your statement and what the article stated. Do you see that your statement is at odds with what was stated in the article?