> Thats not really an argument to make. Maybe you can say you "don't need" and make some arguments for that, but telling people what they don't want.. Doesn't s

> Thats not really an argument to make. Maybe you can say you "don't need" and make some arguments for that, but telling people what they don't want.. Doesn't seem helpful. I stand by my statement. People certainly think they want those things, but they're wrong. Because they want them only until something like this happens and their money is gone because of an error someone else made. Then they suddenly want a way to get back their money a whole lot more, but it's impossible because of exactly those things they thought they wanted. > The BlockChain is a very good principle. It's a good principle for getting distributed, (possibly anonymous) immutable transactions. It's an absolutely terrible idea to apply that to money. I don't think anyone has yet found a practical application it's better suited for than all the alternatives. > But again I don't think you're sure the difference. I'm sure I understand the difference better than you.