4 ms·
Reminds me of academic papers. When I first started in academia I thought it was all about merit, results, and following a proper scientific process. Turns out
by WnZ39p0Dgydaz1 7y ago
Reminds me of academic papers. When I first started in academia I thought it was all about merit, results, and following a proper scientific process.
Turns out if you want to be successful, as measured by paper acceptances or citations, which is the standard metric used by universities and companies, it's all about being able to tell a good story to convince reviewers.
A well-told and convincing story can hide all kind of faults in your experiments or results. It's pretty much all you need.
- bonoboTP 7y agoWhen I started my PhD, I was quite surprised with everyone at the lab always talking about their "storyline" for their upcoming paper. It really is very important.
- gradstudent 7y agoHaving a good story isn't about hiding the faults in your work, it's about making your work accessible to others. It's no good having tons of experiments if you can't explain what they mean and why anyone else should care.
- joshspankit 7y agoYou’ve assumed the end goal of having the work be accessible. The person you’re replying to has a different goal of paper acceptances or citations.
- skummetmaelk 7y agoWhile that is true, the problem is that bad science is easily masked by telling a good story. When telling the story is more important than the science itself, you end up with more and more extravagant projects that always end in failure to achieve anything close to what was written in the grant application.