3 ms·
I'm puzzled at how your comment is not flagged with the words you chose. What effects reduced DHT may or may not have on the body doesn't actually invalidate t
by rjzzleep 7y ago
I'm puzzled at how your comment is not flagged with the words you chose.
What effects reduced DHT may or may not have on the body doesn't actually invalidate the title does it?
To quote you:
> In conclusion, soy protein, regardless of isoflavone content, decreased DHT and DHT/testosterone
And then the conclusion about effects being unclear:
> The relevance of the magnitude of these effects ... requires further investigation
So as long as a person is on the right side of the spectrum they can insult and namecall anyone they like? That can't possibly be news.ycombinator.com's policy or justifiable in any way.
There's another person talking about meta analysis invalidating this, but instead of posting the meta analysis there's just two ad hominem attacks. Seriously?
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- jknoepfler 7y agoThis forum has an unambiguous policy on post titles that link to research articles. Do you object to that policy? Do you think the peer-reviewed journal's editors were somehow inaccurate in the choice of article titles they used, or do you think (just maybe?) that the strengthening of the title's conclusions was done to generate sensational click-bait?