2 ms·
> the fact that there haven't been any cases involving leaked data is as good as it is going to get. No. No proof of leaked data is a basic requirement for tru
by craftinator 7y ago
> the fact that there haven't been any cases involving leaked data is as good as it is going to get.
No. No proof of leaked data is a basic requirement for trust, but at the end of the day, PIA is now associated with known criminals. Unless they can continuously provide impartial audits of their server operations (they can't), then they have lower trustworthiness than any other VPN I know of.
- rasengan 7y agoGood luck with other VPNs. Let me know how that works out for you. Meanwhile, we will continue to stand true to our principles at PIA as the only proven no log VPN provider. I’m biased because I know PIA doesn’t log, but given all the VPNs caught logging and/or overall operating with remedial practices (IPvanish and PureVPN caught logging, NordVPN using default passwords, etc.), even if I wasn’t biased, I would choose the VPN who has a proven no log policy and proven technical know-how. And that’s Private Internet Access - that won’t be changing while I’m here.