The article doesn't make the claim that everything is 100% correct. It is simply pointing out some interesting problems with the analysis of the virus so far, a

The article doesn't make the claim that everything is 100% correct. It is simply pointing out some interesting problems with the analysis of the virus so far, and also pointing out some events that seem to be more than coincidences. > And so a scientist who’s been prolifically involved with studying the molecular interaction of coronaviruses and humanity, spending decades and millions of dollars, and having even helped build a hyper-virulent coronavirus from scratch at UNC – just so happens to be working at the only BSL-4 virology lab in China that also just so happens to be at the epicenter of an outbreak involved a coronavirus that’s escaping zoological classification and whose novel spike-protein region shares more in common with a commercial genetic vector than any of its wild relatives, and has other unnatural characteristics that will be discussed below.