Using the width/height value on an <img> tag feels simply archaic and more importantly doesn't add value to the site visitor. Why? 1. srcset [0]: the browser

Using the width/height value on an <img> tag feels simply archaic and more importantly doesn't add value to the site visitor. Why? 1. srcset [0]: the browser chooses the size of the image, not the server. 2. CSS/Responsive images [1] : Almost all (I am close to saying 100%) of images I have loaded on websites have their width/height adjusted by CSS. Layout updates are often unavoidable in most circumstances surrounding images, there is just no getting around it. So instead of pining over the past, we should adapt for the future. I feel like this argument is the same I had with print designers in the late 90s who made every page a full image because they couldn't handle not having full control over the layout. [0] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/HTMLImageElement/srcset https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/HTMLImageEl... [0b] https://cloudfour.com/thinks/responsive-images-101-part-8-css-images/ https://cloudfour.com/thinks/responsive-images-101-part-8-cs... [1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/HTML/Multimedia_and_embedding/Responsive_images https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/HTML/Multimed...