"Study economics. It isn't that difficult of a subject." But, then saying such a condescending thing, you back that font of economic prowess with: "We're in a

"Study economics. It isn't that difficult of a subject." But, then saying such a condescending thing, you back that font of economic prowess with: "We're in a depression in the US caused by a distortion of the market from government. Under clinton it was decreed that loaning money only to people who could repay it was racist" That's not true at all. First off, way to blame the world financial crisis on poor people (because _that_ isn't playing class warfare at all /s). Secondly, If it were just a bunch of poor people defaulting on mortgages, we wouldn't have needed two "quantitative easings" via buying 2.1 Trillion in MBS, three bailouts, and a stimulus. It wasn't Clinton, or Fannie/Freddie, or even Barney Frank that forced banks to invest 30:1 in toxic securities, and if we had regulations put in place, 30:1 bets on the so-called "poor people's" mortgages wouldn't have been allowed. Place the same blame on this bust that we had on the one during the 20s and then during the S&L bailout in the 80s: Pure Wall Street avarice. They can use the poor people, the government, "insurance" companies, tax shelters, the Fed, asset leverage, and finally the People's tax largesse to stoke their fire. In pure capitalism, everything burns.