4 ms·
Thank you, Haxe definitely has its place on my list of things to check. What worries me however is that there are no examples of output code on their webpage.
by krcz 7y ago
Thank you, Haxe definitely has its place on my list of things to check. What worries me however is that there are no examples of output code on their webpage.
- swsieber 7y agoTrue. I don't think the output will be particularly pretty, and it does assume the presence of its own stdlib. But hopefully it's still fun to see how exactly they do things under the hood.
- haxiomic 7y agoThe output is pretty slim, it's one of the reasons I prefer using haxe over TypeScript when targeting the web – haxe has better dead-code-elimination so output js tends to be smaller and include a greater level of optimisation – check out this example to see what I mean https://try.haxe.org/#4f46D https://try.haxe.org/#4f46D