4 ms·
You are dead right but I wonder if the article is badly representing the story or her lawyers were bad because Getty won the lawsuit anyways. Perhaps she did do
by smaryjerry 7y ago
You are dead right but I wonder if the article is badly representing the story or her lawyers were bad because Getty won the lawsuit anyways. Perhaps she did download the photo from Google images or something and it did have Getty watermark in it when she used it. Otherwise I see this as a slam dunk against Getty.
- daveFNbuck 7y agoWhat lawsuit did Getty win? The article says they haven't responded formally to her suit yet, and it doesn't mention them suing her.
- diffeomorphism 7y agoThe article is from 2016. Links to the outcome of the lawsuit are further up the thread.
- daveFNbuck 7y agoFrom the representation of her story in the article, it hardly seems like Getty has caused her a billion dollars in damages. It's a slam dunk that Getty did something wrong, but that doesn't mean that they necessarily owe her any money.