Yeah, that's my reading too. Getty treated this as if it were exclusive and that they were working as sole agent for the owner. They do this for lots of the thi

Yeah, that's my reading too. Getty treated this as if it were exclusive and that they were working as sole agent for the owner. They do this for lots of the things they distribute. But PD is incidental here. Getty could have legitimately had a exclusive license and still incorrectly gone after its creator.