3 ms·

Because it answers a different type of question: What you would do if you wouldn't have to work for a living, for the next six months. While interesting, most

Because it answers a different type of question: What you would do if you wouldn't have to work for a living, for the next six months. While interesting, most of us can't relate to this situation. Having half a year worth of "fun money" to spend bootstrapping a business idea, or investng in one, is skipping the first step. It's like one of these "draw the rest of the fucking owl" jokes: How to become rich: 1. Get 44k 2. ??? 3. Pofit!

perl4ever 7y ago
You're saying $44K = rich, and that normal income = $88K. If you make $88K then you can have $44K to blow just by only spending $44K, like the people who only make $44K anyway. (Yes, yes, ignoring taxes)
- Can_Not 7y ago
  I get $88K by working fulltime for $X months. Getting $44K _for free_ and then also having an entire fulltime of availability to work on a project is quite a gamechanger.
  - perl4ever 7y ago
    How can you spend $44K on a project and live off of it at the same time, in the latter case where someone handed you the money? And if you are saving $44K per year, why can't you work for two years and then take one year off, having both $44K to live on and $44K to spend on a project? And finally, didn't this start with a $44K loan, not a gift?
    - Can_Not 7y ago
      Bold of you to assume I have even more money.
      - perl4ever 7y ago
        In the scenario where you are handed $44K, you don't have even more money. Therefore, you have to work if you are spending it on some project. The comparison you made was inconsistent.
Drdrdrq 7y ago
> 3. Pofit! Was that "Profit!" or "Poof it!"? ;)