3 ms·
Sure, that can show up in aggregated statistics. But it used to be that there was no treatment for all sorts of metastatic diseases. Now there are. That's not a
by mrosett 7y ago
Sure, that can show up in aggregated statistics. But it used to be that there was no treatment for all sorts of metastatic diseases. Now there are. That's not a function of earlier detection. This isn't made up; we have real RCTs demonstrating this stuff....
- freethinker9 7y agoAs long as we're talking about what 'used to be', there didn't used to be 4 year olds getting Leukemia. And there didn't used to be this idea that 40% of the entire population will be diagnosed with cancer at some point. (!) As far as I can tell, the article is full of facts, obvious stuff really, and the naysayers simply don't want to face the harsh reality that cancer 'research' is total bullshit and always has been. What's causing all of this cancer? Are we just not praying hard enough, is that it? Wait, I know--how about all of the CARCINOGENS that are everywhere, in everything, and are EPA and FDA approved also, with the revolving door always swinging as suits pass from government to big business and back again on their merry way? No...? OK then, maybe we just need to go buy more pink ribbons and 'race for the cure.' Get Usain Bolt in there. He'll turn things around. (Why hasn't anyone hired this guy yet?) And if that doesn't help, maybe try a little prayer also, perhaps.