Thank you. I personally like to link directly to the wikipedia chart to show people that renewables and nuclear account for pretty much a tiny insignificant por

Thank you. I personally like to link directly to the wikipedia chart to show people that renewables and nuclear account for pretty much a tiny insignificant portion of the world's energy consumption. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption#/media/File%3ABp_world_energy_consumption_2016.gif https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption#/me... Almost all of the worlds energy consumption is fossil fuels. So the idea that we are going to do anything to change that fact any time soon is an impossibility unless we want to trigger worldwide economic collapse. Not that facts and data and charts really helps when it comes to the most ardent climate change activists. Throw in the fact that only about 20% of the world is part of the developed, industrialized world. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developed_country https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developed_country So we have 80% of the world ( about 5.6 billion people ) who are looking to become part of the developed, industrialized world. That means more energy. Which means more fossil fuels. Unless we intend to keep the 5.6 billion down trodden down, I'd say the future of fossil fuels is bright. Barring some truly revolutionary advance in energy, we'll be mostly powered by fossil fuels for a very long time.