5 ms·

Cancer is not a disease, but a state of overall body deterioration. You can't fix it; only the body can fix itself. Stop attacking it with carbs and plant oils

Cancer is not a disease, but a state of overall body deterioration. You can't fix it; only the body can fix itself. Stop attacking it with carbs and plant oils, and give it the fuel it needs: unprocessed animal protein and fat.

tsherr 7y ago
Is this based on fact it opinion?
- jaked89 7y ago
  The entire medical field is based on opinion and wizardry. We're sicker and weaker than ever. I've healed myself from various conditions by going carnivore. Take it or leave it.
  - gus_massa 7y ago
    There is a lot of snake oil, from crackpot websites to overhyped university press release. Anyway, two clear points where medicine work: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penicillin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penicillin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smallpox#Eradication https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smallpox#Eradication
    - deleted 7y ago
      [deleted]
    - lebuffon 7y ago
      Full disclosure: I have not read the article yet but gathered a sense of it from the comments here. I like your citations. They make me think about a recent radio interview in Canada where an MD was discussing cervical Cancer. He would not say that vaccination for HPV prevented Cervical Cancer. He would only say that it prevented pre-cancerous lesions and Cervical cancer "is never seen without pre-cancerous lesions". I can understand using scientific rigour to avoid jumping to conclusions. However it makes me wonder about Louis Pasteur and the discovery of micro-bacterial disease origins. Would he have said: "I can't say that these bacteria causes disease X but we have never seen disease X without the presence of these bacteria." ? All that to say perhaps medical research has been going down the wrong path with Cancer. We have one clear case of viral "involvement". :-) How big a stretch is it to extend research in that direction and look for more cases?
      - gus_massa 7y ago
        Virus that can cause cancer are known since 1908 in chickens and since 1964 in humans. More details in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oncovirus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oncovirus But not all cancers are caused by virus. Probably some of the multiple toxic compounds in the smoke of tobacco is the most known case. Radiation is also a well known cause. Even more info https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carcinogenesis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carcinogenesis
        lebuffon 7y ago
        Excellent, so that would mean there is more research coming for other vaccines beyond HPV... ? I have not heard of any but it's not my focus.
        lebuffon 7y ago
        From your wikipedia link, this technique sounds like a great way to find more cancer causing viruses. "...developed a new method to identify cancer viruses based on computer subtraction of human sequences from a tumor transcriptome, called digital transcriptome subtraction (DTS)" It's from 2008. There has been enormous improvements in DNA technology since that time.
  - anticensor 7y ago
    Human digestive tract and limb power share is evolved around omnivorous diet.
mamp 7y ago
It is a disease and survival has dramatically increased because of amazing progress in treatments. Just look at the recent drop in cancer mortality in the US. It is incorrect and irresponsible to blame people who get cancer for eating badly etc. Sometimes things go wrong at a cellular level and cancer happens.
- jaked89 7y ago
  There's no real drop, but number manipulation. They just label you as "healed" if the tumor doesn't return after a some short period of time, which gets shorter by the year. Actually mortality rates are at all times high, globally.
  - jghn 7y ago
    Are you referring to the shift away from using overall survival to progression free survival? If so I agree that this rubbed me the wrong way as well. However if one looks there has been tremendous progress in some cancers. As an example CML went from a swift death sentence to something approaching a chronic condition.
  - mamp 7y ago
    That’s because everyone dies! The article avoids mentioning that cancer rates have risen as other causes, particularly infections, have declined over many decades. The average lifespan has increased globally. In developed countries this is largely due to improvements in cardiovascular drugs/treatment and cancer drugs. The standard survival rates are quoted as 5 year survival unless the cancer is particularly aggressive eg pancreatic. The statistics around cancer are very high quality and public in most countries. However, I suspect data will not influence your view.
- smooc 7y ago
  Did you read the article? It states the drop in cancer mortality is largly due to the fall of smoking. 'A 2006 analysis concluded that “without reductions in smoking, there would have been virtually no reduction in overall cancer mortality in either men or women since the early 1990s.'
keanzu 7y ago
A broken arm is not a disease, but a state of body deterioration. You can't fix it; only the body can fix itself. Stop attacking it with splints, plaster casts and slings, and give it the fuel it needs: unprocessed yellowcake Uranium.
- keanzu 7y ago
  Can't believe I missed this opportunity. ...and give it what the body craves: Brawndo, its got electrolytes. That would have been way better.
sfifs 7y ago
Counterfactual : Steve Jobs

tsherr 7y ago

Is this based on fact it opinion?

jaked89 7y ago
The entire medical field is based on opinion and wizardry. We're sicker and weaker than ever. I've healed myself from various conditions by going carnivore. Take it or leave it.
- gus_massa 7y ago
  There is a lot of snake oil, from crackpot websites to overhyped university press release. Anyway, two clear points where medicine work: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penicillin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penicillin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smallpox#Eradication https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smallpox#Eradication
  - deleted 7y ago
    [deleted]
  - lebuffon 7y ago
    Full disclosure: I have not read the article yet but gathered a sense of it from the comments here. I like your citations. They make me think about a recent radio interview in Canada where an MD was discussing cervical Cancer. He would not say that vaccination for HPV prevented Cervical Cancer. He would only say that it prevented pre-cancerous lesions and Cervical cancer "is never seen without pre-cancerous lesions". I can understand using scientific rigour to avoid jumping to conclusions. However it makes me wonder about Louis Pasteur and the discovery of micro-bacterial disease origins. Would he have said: "I can't say that these bacteria causes disease X but we have never seen disease X without the presence of these bacteria." ? All that to say perhaps medical research has been going down the wrong path with Cancer. We have one clear case of viral "involvement". :-) How big a stretch is it to extend research in that direction and look for more cases?
    - gus_massa 7y ago
      Virus that can cause cancer are known since 1908 in chickens and since 1964 in humans. More details in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oncovirus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oncovirus But not all cancers are caused by virus. Probably some of the multiple toxic compounds in the smoke of tobacco is the most known case. Radiation is also a well known cause. Even more info https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carcinogenesis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carcinogenesis
      - lebuffon 7y ago
        Excellent, so that would mean there is more research coming for other vaccines beyond HPV... ? I have not heard of any but it's not my focus.
        lebuffon 7y ago
        From your wikipedia link, this technique sounds like a great way to find more cancer causing viruses. "...developed a new method to identify cancer viruses based on computer subtraction of human sequences from a tumor transcriptome, called digital transcriptome subtraction (DTS)" It's from 2008. There has been enormous improvements in DNA technology since that time.
- anticensor 7y ago
  Human digestive tract and limb power share is evolved around omnivorous diet.

mamp 7y ago

It is a disease and survival has dramatically increased because of amazing progress in treatments. Just look at the recent drop in cancer mortality in the US. It is incorrect and irresponsible to blame people who get cancer for eating badly etc. Sometimes things go wrong at a cellular level and cancer happens.

jaked89 7y ago
There's no real drop, but number manipulation. They just label you as "healed" if the tumor doesn't return after a some short period of time, which gets shorter by the year. Actually mortality rates are at all times high, globally.
- jghn 7y ago
  Are you referring to the shift away from using overall survival to progression free survival? If so I agree that this rubbed me the wrong way as well. However if one looks there has been tremendous progress in some cancers. As an example CML went from a swift death sentence to something approaching a chronic condition.
- mamp 7y ago
  That’s because everyone dies! The article avoids mentioning that cancer rates have risen as other causes, particularly infections, have declined over many decades. The average lifespan has increased globally. In developed countries this is largely due to improvements in cardiovascular drugs/treatment and cancer drugs. The standard survival rates are quoted as 5 year survival unless the cancer is particularly aggressive eg pancreatic. The statistics around cancer are very high quality and public in most countries. However, I suspect data will not influence your view.
smooc 7y ago
Did you read the article? It states the drop in cancer mortality is largly due to the fall of smoking. 'A 2006 analysis concluded that “without reductions in smoking, there would have been virtually no reduction in overall cancer mortality in either men or women since the early 1990s.'

keanzu 7y ago

A broken arm is not a disease, but a state of body deterioration. You can't fix it; only the body can fix itself. Stop attacking it with splints, plaster casts and slings, and give it the fuel it needs: unprocessed yellowcake Uranium.

keanzu 7y ago
Can't believe I missed this opportunity. ...and give it what the body craves: Brawndo, its got electrolytes. That would have been way better.

sfifs 7y ago

Counterfactual : Steve Jobs