2 ms·
What are your issues with scope in FPC? Namespaces have been supported since 3.0. The other things I understand though. I much prefer Pascal syntax and compila
by bjoli 7y ago
What are your issues with scope in FPC? Namespaces have been supported since 3.0.
The other things I understand though. I much prefer Pascal syntax and compilation time, but I have started reaching for c++ these days
- bmn__ 7y ago> What are your issues with scope in FPC? Simple begin/end should create a scope, cf. { … } in ES6 or Perl. Instead, to make it work, the programmer has to nest named procedures. > Namespaces have been supported since 3.0. Sorry, I did not notice. Apparently it's been available for 5 years, but the standard library or other popular libraries did not adopt the feature.