3 ms·
Unless your job is coding novel algorithm implementations under strict deadlines without a computer, how does answering this question in a job interview prove o
by ticmasta 7y ago
Unless your job is coding novel algorithm implementations under strict deadlines without a computer, how does answering this question in a job interview prove or disprove your efficacy in the actual position? It only proves you're good at interviewing, which, if you think about it, is not a desirable skill in your new hire 6-12 months down the road.
- vecter 7y agoI see it as an IQ test. Official IQ tests are illegal for hiring of course. So they use algorithms instead. Not justifying it, but that’s the only logical answer I can think of.
- jonex 7y agoHad to look this up, since I hadn't heard of IQ tests being illegal. It seems to me that a domain specific IQ test should be perfectly fine to use. AFAICT the origin of this is a case from the 70s [1] where it was ruled against the use of IQ tests at a particular company. The reason was that the IQ test did not reflect an actual business need, but it made it harder for black people to qualify. So making an intelligence test that actually relates to the work at hand, such as testing the ability to design algorithms as a programmer or the ability to comprehend text for a journalist, seems like more than just a workaround, it's a way to actually follow the intent of the ruling. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griggs_v._Duke_Power_Co https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griggs_v._Duke_Power_Co.