4 ms·

Didn't work for me, had to use the google cache version.[1] 1. https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:rkHSE4Dp5sIJ:https://hraf.yale.edu/romanti

• userbinator 7y ago
  &client=firefox-b-d&hl=sv&gl=se Just an FYI if you didn't know, be careful when sharing links to check that they don't disclose more information about you than you'd like.
  • Johnny555 7y ago
    Just curious what that's disclosing, his browser? Anything else?
    • hhanesand 7y ago
      Guessing those last two parameters are languages. I don't see the issue, but I commonly trim tracking strings off too.
      • ta999999171 7y ago
        For the layperson reading, for articles, this is usually anything after the ? in a URL.
        • Johnny555 7y ago
          That's not a good rule of thumb since often the unique identifier you're interested in is a query arg, so if you strip of everything after the ?, you're left with nothing. like the URL above, all you'll have left is: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search
          • userbinator 7y ago
            Yes, there's no real general rule (see HN articles for instance) but "if I omit these parts of the URL, I get the same content" is usually a safe bet.
• enjoyyourlife 7y ago
  Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20200214235741/https://hraf.yale.edu/romantic-or-disgusting-passionate-kissing-is-not-a-human-universal/ https://web.archive.org/web/20200214235741/https://hraf.yale...