4 ms·
> It is not undue revisionism. Any level of revisionism is undue.
by winkeltripel 7y ago
> It is not undue revisionism.
Any level of revisionism is undue.
- toxik 7y agoI think you need to brush up on what revisionism means in the historical context, so let me help you: > In historiography, the term historical revisionism identifies the re-interpretation of the historical record. It usually means challenging the orthodox (established, accepted or traditional) views held by professional scholars about a historical event, introducing contrary evidence, or reinterpreting the motivations and decisions of the people involved. The revision of the historical record can reflect new discoveries of fact, evidence, and interpretation, which then provokes a revised history. In dramatic cases, revisionism involves a reversal of older moral judgments. In other words, it is historical revisionism that reinterprets history through modern values where slavery is wrong, and women can vote.