4 ms·
Im skeptical this would work for anything bigger than paint flakes and possibly some very small fragments the size of tiny bolts. The thing is at orbital speed
by m4rtink 7y ago
Im skeptical this would work for anything bigger than paint flakes and possibly some very small fragments the size of tiny bolts.
The thing is at orbital speeds colisions are VERY energetic events that don't behave likey normal low speed collisions. The thing coliding effectively turn into rapidly expanding plasma before any of the expected plastic deformation, shearing, etc. one would expect on a low speed collision (say a truck in full speed hotting a wall).
When you think about it, this effectively all the fuel and oxydizer that has been used to place the given object into orbit releasing all it's energy at once in a very small area.
As an example let's say your steel plate manged to hit a 700 kg satellite at ~8 km/s, which is perfectly possible with, with the worst case being a 16 km/s combined in a head on collision. How much energy will get released ?
Say the sattelite has been put in orbit using thr Soyuz 2 launcher, which can accelerate up to 7000 kg to tje orbital speed of 8 km/s. Soyuz 2 weighs about 312 tons, more than 90% of which is fuel and oxydizer. It could launch 10 of our 700 kg satellites.
This effectively means a 700 ks sattelite hittimg your 8 ton steel plate is equivalent of a point detonation of ~30 tons of perfect mixture of liquid oxygen and kerosene.
I don't tging a 8 ton steel plate will survive that in any usable shape.
- rtkwe 7y agoThis isn't right at all, a lot of the energy from launch goes into 1) gravity 2) air resistance 3) accelerating the fuels to do 1 and 2. Only the actual mass and velocity of the satellite matter. It's a lot but it is very far from being equal to the whole mass of the rocket.
- m4rtink 7y agoIndeed, it's definitely not 100% conversion of chemical to potential energy & speed, but given that we are talking hundreds of tons of very energetic chemicals, it's still a lot & IMHO still a nice visualization.
- rtkwe 7y agoNo, it's not even conversion efficiency of burning fuels, rockets expend a lot of their energy accelerating fuel that is later burned as well. That energy is not in the satellite when it's in orbit.