3 ms·
"A federal district court judge ruled in favor of Apple, deciding that workers had to prove they not only were restrained from leaving but that there was no way
by megous 7y ago
"A federal district court judge ruled in favor of Apple, deciding that workers had to prove they not only were restrained from leaving but that there was no way to avoid having personal items searched."
So workers that would not have a personal bag would avoid a search? You can take away stuff from the store by hiding it in your clothes, I guess unless you're working naked. How would anyone be able to avoid the search?
Am I missing something?
- sterlind 7y agoI think Apple was only searching bags, not patting down their employees (likely out of fear of sexual harassment allegations than any principled restraint on Apple's part.)
- angry_octet 7y agoThere are some really terrible Federal judges. And they can be there until they die of old age.
- angry_octet 7y agoI don't know if y'all can't read or you're Republicans. I'm referring to the lower court who decided you could come to work naked.