4 ms·
Because it's pretty standard in government contracts to sue after you lose just-in-case. Another example is Sig Sauer winning the M17 / M18 contract and Glock s
by TallGuyShort 7y ago
Because it's pretty standard in government contracts to sue after you lose just-in-case. Another example is Sig Sauer winning the M17 / M18 contract and Glock suing. When I hear of this, I assume it's just a frivolous lawsuit.
- LiquidSky 7y agoBut what does that have to do with the judge being biased?
- TallGuyShort 7y agoNot the judge being personally biased, per se, but in a frivolous lawsuit the defendant is made a victim of otherwise unnecessary legal fees and process, which is a bias in the system. It seems more fair that in a case where there's a high chance the lawsuit is frivolous and the plaintiff party can reasonably part with the money for a time, putting in a provision like this helps even things a bit.