3 ms·

” They side-step a lot of the planned obsolescence and intentional feature scarcity US companies have become so dependent on to avoid meaningful R&D. ” They al

” They side-step a lot of the planned obsolescence and intentional feature scarcity US companies have become so dependent on to avoid meaningful R&D. ” They also “side-step” the capital and years of research required to come up with the products. Why invest in R&D when you can invest in corporate espionage for a fraction of the cost?

mNovak 7y ago
Not here to debate whether IP theft happens, but to be clear Huawei does also invest billions into R&D (domestic and abroad)
karavelov 7y ago
If they didn't invest in research, how were they first to market with 5G solutions?
- richk449 7y ago
  They even stole the stuff we haven’t invented yet !!
  - blackrock 7y ago
    OMG.. Huawei has a time machine too? Damn it, that’s it! That’s just not fair. We must ban them now. Won’t somebody think of the children?
chrischen 7y ago
That's a separate issue. If Huawei violated some IP patents then why aren't they suing for that? Any meaningful R&D developments would be patented and would be publicly available and described anyways. And if your product is so weakly innovative that a picture of the circuity or some power point slides basically give away significant trade secrets, then your product probably sucks. These charges sound like they're for non-innovation based trade secrets, whatever those may be.