3 ms·
I'm still going to use it but I'm not going to evangelize it the way I would if it actually provided encryption and trust. It was never supposed to encrypt loo
by alwillis 7y ago
I'm still going to use it but I'm not going to evangelize it the way I would if it actually provided encryption and trust.
It was never supposed to encrypt lookup; that was mostly a disingenuous strawman argument from the usual suspects.
It does provide a chain of trust. By using the public key published in your zone, a validating resolver checks the digital signatures from the root to your zone.
It’s no different than when a browser checks the digital signatures on a certificate that’s signed by an intermediate certificate that was signed by a root certificate.
For authentication and trust purposes, every resource record in a DNSSEC-signed zone is cryptographically signed and validating resolvers--Unbound, Knot Resolver, BIND--confirm them.