3 ms·
Naming a variable solely after its type is never particularly useful. A name like `currentChar` would probably enhance readability. Of course if your code is ju
by viklove 7y ago
Naming a variable solely after its type is never particularly useful. A name like `currentChar` would probably enhance readability. Of course if your code is just 2 lines long, `c` works just fine (that's not usually the case though).
You should probably abstract away some of that logic though (and `string` isn't a great variable name either):
boolean tabFound = includes(line, '\t');
- vbezhenar 7y agoHow would you name an abstract string without any implied meaning?
- viklove 7y agoIf the functionality you're writing is truly that abstract, an abstract variable name is fine. Your example didn't include the method signature though, so I assumed it was a part of some larger (concrete) code block.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]