3 ms·
Yeah I'm not answering that because nobody is actually "discounting" that lower-featured tier, that's a dodge. The base tiers are not discounted. They're the ac
by eropple 7y ago
Yeah I'm not answering that because nobody is actually "discounting" that lower-featured tier, that's a dodge. The base tiers are not discounted. They're the actual price for those features.
And that's completely fine. You can have an enterprise tier with more features! What I am saying--and I understand that you understand this but for your question to have any rhetorical impact must misapprehend it--is that they must not be security-based features as it is full-stop unethical to charge a toll for basic security.
- sokoloff 7y agoThey’re the actual price for those features only because of the subsidy provided by selling SSO to enterprise customers, IMO. It’s like arguing that economy airline seating sucks and shouldn’t be allowed to be different than business class. Economy is subsidized by first and business. If you legislate away the difference, it’s not the case that everyone now gets a business class seat at the economy ticket price but much more likely that the other equilibrium emerges where only business class service and pricing is offered.
- eropple 7y agoOoh, analogies. Try this one on for size: "no, you're not allowed to take seat belts away from economy passengers." This shit is baseline. And if it continues to not be, it's time to get legislators involved. Because that's what we all want, I'm sure.